Co-Use, Simultaneous Use, and Mixing of Cannabis and Tobacco: A Cross-National Comparison of Canada and the US by Cannabis Administration Type DOI Open Access
Alanna K. Chu, Michael Chaiton,

Pamela Kaufman

et al.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 20(5), P. 4206 - 4206

Published: Feb. 27, 2023

Introduction: Increasing cannabis legalization raises concerns that the use of tobacco, frequently used with cannabis, will also increase. This study investigated association between legal status in places residence and prevalence tobacco co-use, simultaneous use, mixing by comparing among adults Canada (prior to legalization) vs. US states had legalized recreational not as September 2018. Methods: Data were drawn from 2018 International Cannabis Policy Study, conducted respondents aged 16–65 recruited nonprobability consumer panels. Differences different products examined using logistic regression models place past-12-month consumers (N = 6744). Results: Co-use past 12 months most common states. Among consumers, co-use less states, while was frequent both illegal compared Canada. Use edibles associated lower odds all three outcomes, smoking dried herb or hash higher odds. Conclusions: The proportion who jurisdictions despite use. Edible inversely suggesting edible does appear be increased

Language: Английский

Cannabis use and cannabis use disorder DOI
Jason P. Connor, Daniel Stjepanović, Bernard Le Foll

et al.

Nature Reviews Disease Primers, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 7(1)

Published: Feb. 25, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

308

Public health implications of legalising the production and sale of cannabis for medicinal and recreational use DOI
Wayne Hall, Daniel Stjepanović, Jonathan P. Caulkins

et al.

The Lancet, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 394(10208), P. 1580 - 1590

Published: Oct. 1, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

291

Routes of administration for cannabis use – basic prevalence and related health outcomes: A scoping review and synthesis DOI
Cayley Russell, Sergio Rueda, Robin Room

et al.

International Journal of Drug Policy, Journal Year: 2017, Volume and Issue: 52, P. 87 - 96

Published: Dec. 23, 2017

Language: Английский

Citations

258

Changes in delta‐9‐tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) concentrations in cannabis over time: systematic review and meta‐analysis DOI Creative Commons
Tom P. Freeman, Sam Craft, Jack Wilson

et al.

Addiction, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 116(5), P. 1000 - 1010

Published: Nov. 7, 2020

Abstract Background and aims Cannabis products with high delta‐9‐tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentrations carry an increased risk of addiction mental health disorders, while it has been suggested that cannabidiol (CBD) may moderate the effects THC. This study aimed to systematically review meta‐analyse changes in THC CBD cannabis over time (PROSPERO registration: CRD42019130055). Design Embase, MEDLINE® Epub Ahead Print, In‐Process Other Non‐Indexed Citations Daily, Global Health, PsycINFO Scopus were searched from inception 27/03/2019 for observational studies reporting mean and/or concentration at least three annual points. Searches extraction conducted by two independent reviewers. Random meta‐regression models estimated each product within study; these estimates pooled across random models. Results We identified 12 eligible USA, UK, Netherlands, France, Denmark, Italy New Zealand. For all herbal cannabis, 0.29% year (95% CI: 0.11, 0.47), P < 0.001 based on 66 747 samples eight studies, 1970–2017. resin, 0.57% 0.10, 1.03), = 0.017 17 371 1975–2017. There was no evidence [−0.01% −0.02, 0.01), 0.280; 49 434 five 1995–2017] or resin [0.03% −0.11, 0.18), 0.651; 11 382 six 1992–2017]. Risk bias low apart non‐random sampling most studies. substantial heterogeneity. Conclusions Concentrations international markets 1970 2017 remained stable. Increases greater than cannabis. Rising attributable market share high‐THC sinsemilla relative low‐THC traditional

Language: Английский

Citations

255

Assessing the public health impacts of legalizing recreational cannabis use: the US experience DOI Open Access
Wayne Hall, Michael T. Lynskey

World Psychiatry, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 19(2), P. 179 - 186

Published: May 11, 2020

The sale of cannabis for adult recreational use has been made legal in nine US states since 2012, and nationally Uruguay 2013 Canada 2018. We review research on the effects legalization among adults adolescents cannabis-related harms; impact legalizing price, availability, potency use; regulatory policies that may increase or limit adverse legalization. substantially reduced price cannabis, increased its potency, more available to users. It appears have frequency adults, but not so far youth. also emergency department attendances hospitalizations some harms. relatively modest date probably reflect restrictions number locations retail outlets constraints commercialization under a continued federal prohibition cannabis. Future evaluations should monitor: sales volumes, prices content tetrahydrocannabinol; prevalence household high school surveys; car crash fatalities injuries involving drivers who are cannabis-impaired; presentations related cannabis; demand treatment disorders; regular vulnerable young people mental health services, schools criminal justice system. Governments propose legalize regulate need fund monitor impacts these policy changes public health, take advantage this develop ways regulating can-nabis minimize health.

Language: Английский

Citations

236

‘Standard THC units’: a proposal to standardize dose across all cannabis products and methods of administration DOI
Tom P. Freeman, Valentina Lorenzetti

Addiction, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 115(7), P. 1207 - 1216

Published: Oct. 12, 2019

Abstract Background and Aims Cannabis products are becoming increasingly diverse, vary considerably in concentrations of ∆ 9 ‐tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) cannabidiol (CBD). Higher doses THC can increase the risk harm from cannabis, while CBD may partially offset some these effects. Lower Risk Use Guidelines currently lack recommendations based on quantity use, could be improved by implementing standard units. However, there is no consensus how units should measured or standardized among different cannabis methods administration. Argument Existing proposals for have been specific administration (e.g. joints) not capture other methods, including pipes, bongs, blunts, dabbing, vaporizers, vape pens, edibles liquids. Other grams cannabis) cannot account heterogeneity products. Similar to alcohol units, we argue that reflect primary active pharmacological constituents (dose THC). On basis experimental ecological data, public health considerations existing policy, propose a ‘standard unit’ fixed at 5 mg all If supported sufficient evidence future, consumption might offer an additional strategy reduction. Conclusions Standard potentially applied guide consumers promote safer patterns use.

Language: Английский

Citations

173

Prevalence and forms of cannabis use in legal vs. illegal recreational cannabis markets DOI
Samantha Goodman, Elle Wadsworth, Cesar Leos‐Toro

et al.

International Journal of Drug Policy, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 76, P. 102658 - 102658

Published: Jan. 9, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

158

Cannabis and its derivatives DOI
Gangotri Debbarma, Pratap Chandra Acharya

Elsevier eBooks, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 37 - 91

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

147

Lower-Risk Cannabis Use Guidelines (LRCUG) for reducing health harms from non-medical cannabis use: A comprehensive evidence and recommendations update DOI Creative Commons
Benedikt Fischer, Tessa Robinson, Chris Bullen

et al.

International Journal of Drug Policy, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 99, P. 103381 - 103381

Published: Aug. 28, 2021

Cannabis use is common, especially among young people, and associated with risks for various health harms. Some jurisdictions have recently moved to legalization/regulation pursuing public goals. Evidence-based 'Lower Risk Use Guidelines' (LRCUG) recommendations were previously developed reduce modifiable risk factors of cannabis-related adverse outcomes; related evidence has evolved substantially since. We aimed review new scientific develop comprehensively up-to-date LRCUG, including their recommendations, on this basis. Targeted searches literature (since 2016) main outcomes by the user-individual conducted. Topical areas informed previous LRCUG content expanded upon current evidence. Searches preferentially focused systematic reviews, supplemented key individual studies. The results evidence-graded, topically organized narratively summarized; through an iterative expert consensus development process. A substantial body cannabis use-related harms identified varying quality. Twelve substantive recommendation clusters three precautionary statements developed. In general, suggests that individuals can if they delay onset until after adolescence, avoid high-potency (THC) products high-frequency/-intensity use, refrain from smoking-routes administration. While people are particularly vulnerable harms, other sub-groups (e.g., pregnant women, drivers, older adults, those co-morbidities) advised exercise particular caution risks. Legal/regulated should be used where possible. result in outcomes, mostly higher-risk use. Reducing help offer one targeted intervention component within a comprehensive approach They require effective audience-tailoring dissemination, regular updating as become available, evaluated impact.

Language: Английский

Citations

136

Association of cannabis potency with mental ill health and addiction: a systematic review DOI
Kat Petrilli,

Shelan Ofori,

Lindsey A. Hines

et al.

The Lancet Psychiatry, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 9(9), P. 736 - 750

Published: July 25, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

129