Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 61 - 74
Published: May 7, 2024
Abstract
‘Learning
theory
and
anxiety’
explains
the
role
of
learning
in
underpinning
cognitive
concepts.
It
distinguishes
reinforcement
from
reinforcers
goals.
emphasizes
contingency
altering
motivational
valence
relationships
between
gain/loss
approach/avoidance
depending
on
presentation
or
omission
reinforcers.
classical
instrumental
conditioning
as
basis
for
‘two-process’
theories
learning,
dependence
fear/frustration
hope/relief
two,
respective,
fundamental
systems,
resultant
generation
central
states
so
emotions.
These
distinctions
then
lead
to
analysis
elicited
reactions
experiments;
a
detailed
learning-theoretic
description
key
inputs
goal
inhibition
system
anxiety.
The
methodologies
two-process
theorists
contrast
with
‘ethoexperimental’
methodology,
providing
independent
bases
categorizing
generalizing.
If
ethology
overcategorizes
overgeneralizes,
their
combination
achieves
balance
potentially
deeper
perspective.
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: May 7, 2024
Abstract
The
Neuropsychology
of
Anxiety
first
appeared
in
1982
as
the
volume
Oxford
Psychology
Series,
and
it
quickly
established
itself
classic
work
on
subject.
It
second
edition
(appearing
2000)
have
been
cited
at
a
steadily
increasing
rate
passing
500/year
2017.
field
has
continued
to
expand
last
quarter
century
necessitating
this
third
edition.
This
completely
updated
revised
(with
many
figures
converted
colour)
retains
original
core
concepts
while
expanding
often
simplifying
details.
includes
new
chapter
prefrontal
cortex,
which
integrates
frontal
hippocampal
views
anxiety
an
extensively
modified
personality
providing
basis
for
further
developments
Reinforcement
Sensitivity
Theory.
book
is
essential
postgraduate
students
researchers
experimental
psychology
neuroscience,
well
all
clinical
psychologists
psychiatrists.
Network Neuroscience,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
7(3), P. 864 - 905
Published: Jan. 1, 2023
Progress
in
scientific
disciplines
is
accompanied
by
standardization
of
terminology.
Network
neuroscience,
at
the
level
macroscale
organization
brain,
beginning
to
confront
challenges
associated
with
developing
a
taxonomy
its
fundamental
explanatory
constructs.
The
Workgroup
for
HArmonized
Taxonomy
NETworks
(WHATNET)
was
formed
2020
as
an
Organization
Human
Brain
Mapping
(OHBM)-endorsed
best
practices
committee
provide
recommendations
on
points
consensus,
identify
open
questions,
and
highlight
areas
ongoing
debate
service
moving
field
toward
standardized
reporting
network
neuroscience
results.
conducted
survey
catalog
current
large-scale
brain
nomenclature.
A
few
well-known
names
(e.g.,
default
mode
network)
dominated
responses
survey,
number
illuminating
disagreement
emerged.
We
summarize
results
initial
considerations
from
workgroup.
This
perspective
piece
includes
selective
review
this
enterprise,
including
(1)
scale,
resolution,
hierarchies;
(2)
interindividual
variability
networks;
(3)
dynamics
nonstationarity
(4)
consideration
affiliations
subcortical
structures;
(5)
multimodal
information.
close
minimal
guidelines
cognitive
communities
adopt.
Humans
have
an
extraordinary
ability
to
create
evolutionarily
novel
knowledge,
such
as
writing
systems
and
mathematics.This
accumulated
knowledge
over
several
millennia
supports
large,
dynamic
societies
that
now
require
children
learn
this
in
educational
settings.This
Element
provides
a
framework
for
understanding
the
evolution
of
brain
enable
innovation
learning
how
these
can
act
on
human
cognitive
universals,
language,
abilities,
reading
writing.Critical
features
networks
include
top-down
control
attention,
which
is
central
formation
well
self-awareness
mental
time
travel
support
academic
self-concepts
generation
long-term
goals.The
basics
are
reviewed
updated
here,
implications
instructional
practices.
Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(1)
Published: Jan. 16, 2024
Abstract
Previous
research
investigating
relations
between
general
intelligence
and
graph-theoretical
properties
of
the
brain’s
intrinsic
functional
network
has
yielded
contradictory
results.
A
promising
approach
to
tackle
such
mixed
findings
is
multi-center
analysis.
For
this
study,
we
analyzed
data
from
four
independent
sets
(total
N
>
2000)
identify
robust
associations
amongst
samples
g
factor
scores
global
as
well
node-specific
graph
metrics.
On
level,
showed
no
significant
with
efficiency
or
small-world
propensity
in
any
sample,
but
positive
clustering
coefficient
two
samples.
elastic-net
regressions
for
nodal
local
brain
areas
that
exhibited
consistent
sets.
Using
identified
via
regression
one
sample
predict
other
was
not
successful
only
led
significant,
one-way
prediction
across
efficiency.
Thus,
using
conventional
theoretical
measures
based
on
resting-state
imaging
did
result
replicable
connectivity
intelligence.
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 371 - 430
Published: May 7, 2024
Abstract
‘Anxiety
and
personality’
links
the
anxiolytic-derived
state
neuropsychology
of
previous
chapters
to
personality
traits.
Traits
are
seen
as
sensitivities
structures,
goal
control
systems,
more
global
modulators
systems.
It
lays
ground
work
for
seeing
psychiatric
disorders
resulting
from
one
or
extreme
sensitivities.
While
main
focus
is
anxiety,
it
also
discusses
implications
Reinforcement
Sensitivity
Theory
(RST)
with
additional
comment
on
Big
5.
reviews
issues
arising
word
meanings,
evolution,
need
biomarkers,
hierarchical
organization,
continuity
versus
discontinuity
provides
recommendation
application
work,
throughout.
distinguishes
neuroticism
trait
a
new
dopaminergic
neurology
reinforcement
sensitivity,
strongly
reinforcers,
first
anxiety
disorder
biomarker,
identifies
problems
existing
RST
scales,
future
neural
solutions.
Linking
neurobiology
to
relatively
stable
individual
differences
in
cognition,
emotion,
motivation,
and
behavior
can
require
large
sample
sizes
yield
replicable
results.
Given
the
nature
of
between-person
research,
at
least
hundreds
are
likely
be
necessary
most
neuroimaging
studies
differences,
regardless
whether
they
investigating
whole
brain
or
more
focal
hypotheses.
However,
appropriate
size
depends
on
expected
effect
size.
Therefore,
we
propose
four
strategies
increase
which
may
help
enable
detection
effects
samples
rather
than
thousands:
(1)
theoretical
matching
between
tasks
behavioral
constructs
interest;
(2)
increasing
reliability
both
neural
psychological
measurement;
(3)
individualization
measures
for
each
participant;
(4)
using
multivariate
approaches
with
cross-validation
instead
univariate
approaches.
We
discuss
challenges
associated
these
methods
highlight
improvements
that
will
field
move
toward
a
robust
accessible
neuroscience
differences.
Progress
in
scientific
disciplines
is
accompanied
by
standardization
of
terminology.
Network
neuroscience,
at
the
level
macro-scale
organization
brain,
beginning
to
confront
challenges
associated
with
developing
a
taxonomy
its
fundamental
explanatory
constructs.
The
Workgroup
for
HArmonized
Taxonomy
NETworks
(WHATNET)
was
formed
2020
as
an
Organization
Human
Brain
Mapping
(OHBM)-endorsed
best
practices
committee
provide
recommendations
on
points
consensus,
identify
open
questions,
and
highlight
areas
ongoing
debate
service
moving
field
towards
standardized
reporting
network
neuroscience
results.
conducted
survey
catalog
current
large-scale
brain
nomenclature.
A
few
well-known
names
(e.g.,
default
mode
network)
dominated
responses
survey,
number
illuminating
disagreement
emerged.
We
summarize
results
initial
considerations
from
workgroup.
This
perspective
piece
includes
selective
review
this
enterprise,
including
1)
scale,
resolution,
hierarchies;
2)
inter-individual
variability
networks;
3)
dynamics
non-stationarity
4)
consideration
affiliations
subcortical
structures;
5)
multi-modal
information.
close
minimal
guidelines
cognitive
communities
adopt.
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 241 - 284
Published: May 7, 2024
Abstract
‘Fundamentals
of
the
septo-hippocampal
system’
derives
a
range
data
principles
from
an
overview
sept-hippocampal
data.
It
reviews
anxiolytic
action
on
system
and
behaviour;
control
rhythmical
slow
activity
(RSA)/‘theta’
activity;
relationship
to
sensory
processing,
working/active
memory,
conditioning,
emotion.
then
discusses
how
approach
understanding
system,
its
anatomy,
role
in
long-term
memory
via
mismatch
detection.
emphasizes
important
affectively
linked
neuromodulatory
systems
hippocampal
function;
hippocampus
at
least
70
chemical
factors,
including
corticosterone/cortisol.
Its
series
are
solidly
based
available
so
all
theories
should
be
judged
against
them.
While
place
severe
limits
assumptions
machinery
theory,
they
not
sufficient
provide
theory
themselves.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 6, 2024
Abstract
Growing
understanding
of
the
nature
brain
function
has
led
to
increased
interest
in
interpreting
properties
large-scale
networks.
Methodological
advances
network
neuroscience
provide
means
decompose
these
networks
into
smaller
functional
communities
and
measure
how
they
reconfigure
over
time
as
an
index
their
dynamic
flexible
properties.
Recent
evidence
identified
associations
between
flexibility
a
variety
traits
pertaining
complex
cognition
including
creativity
working
memory.
The
present
study
used
measures
resting-state
connectivity
data
from
Human
Connectome
Project
(
N
=
994)
test
with
Openness/Intellect
general
intelligence,
two
that
involve
cognition.
Using
machine-learning
cross-validation
approach,
we
reliable
intelligence
cohesive
parcels
large
across
cortex,
overall
among
communities.
These
findings
are
reasonably
consistent
previous
theories
neural
correlates
Openness/Intellect,
help
expand
on
behavior
within
context
broader
personality
dimensions.