Addiction,
Journal Year:
2017,
Volume and Issue:
113(5), P. 958 - 966
Published: Dec. 21, 2017
Time
to
acknowledge
the
mixed
effects
of
cannabis
on
health:
a
summary
and
critical
review
NASEM
2017
report
health
cannabinoids
This
is
National
Academies
Sciences,
Engineering
Medicine
(NASEM)
cannabis.The
stated
that
are
understudied,
research
findings
mixed.It
concluded
underdeveloped
evidence
base
poses
public
risk
rightly
addressed
complexities
need
be
resolved
collaboratively.We
support
NASEM's
urgent
call
for
research,
but
add
cannot
attributed
solely
limitations.Rather,
we
propose
heterogeneity
in
advance
field.
The Lancet Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
6(5), P. 427 - 436
Published: March 19, 2019
Cannabis
use
is
associated
with
increased
risk
of
later
psychotic
disorder
but
whether
it
affects
incidence
the
remains
unclear.
We
aimed
to
identify
patterns
cannabis
strongest
effect
on
odds
across
Europe
and
explore
differences
in
such
contribute
variations
rates
disorder.
Pharmacology & Therapeutics,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
195, P. 132 - 161
Published: Oct. 20, 2018
The
laws
governing
cannabis
are
evolving
worldwide
and
associated
with
changing
patterns
of
use.
main
psychoactive
drug
in
is
Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol
(THC),
a
partial
agonist
at
the
endocannabinoid
CB1
receptor.
Acutely,
THC
produce
range
effects
on
several
neurocognitive
pharmacological
systems.
These
include
executive,
emotional,
reward
memory
processing
via
direct
interactions
system
indirect
glutamatergic,
GABAergic
dopaminergic
Cannabidiol,
non-intoxicating
cannabinoid
found
some
forms
cannabis,
may
offset
these
acute
effects.
Heavy
repeated
use,
particularly
during
adolescence,
has
been
adverse
systems,
which
increase
risk
mental
illnesses
including
addiction
psychosis.
Here,
we
provide
comprehensive
state
art
review
chronic
neuropsychopharmacology
by
synthesizing
available
neuroimaging
research
humans.
We
describe
exposure
development,
implications
for
understanding
psychosis
use
disorder,
methodological
considerations.
Greater
precise
mechanisms
underlying
also
give
rise
to
new
treatment
targets.
International Journal of Drug Policy,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
99, P. 103381 - 103381
Published: Aug. 28, 2021
Cannabis
use
is
common,
especially
among
young
people,
and
associated
with
risks
for
various
health
harms.
Some
jurisdictions
have
recently
moved
to
legalization/regulation
pursuing
public
goals.
Evidence-based
'Lower
Risk
Use
Guidelines'
(LRCUG)
recommendations
were
previously
developed
reduce
modifiable
risk
factors
of
cannabis-related
adverse
outcomes;
related
evidence
has
evolved
substantially
since.
We
aimed
review
new
scientific
develop
comprehensively
up-to-date
LRCUG,
including
their
recommendations,
on
this
basis.
Targeted
searches
literature
(since
2016)
main
outcomes
by
the
user-individual
conducted.
Topical
areas
informed
previous
LRCUG
content
expanded
upon
current
evidence.
Searches
preferentially
focused
systematic
reviews,
supplemented
key
individual
studies.
The
results
evidence-graded,
topically
organized
narratively
summarized;
through
an
iterative
expert
consensus
development
process.
A
substantial
body
cannabis
use-related
harms
identified
varying
quality.
Twelve
substantive
recommendation
clusters
three
precautionary
statements
developed.
In
general,
suggests
that
individuals
can
if
they
delay
onset
until
after
adolescence,
avoid
high-potency
(THC)
products
high-frequency/-intensity
use,
refrain
from
smoking-routes
administration.
While
people
are
particularly
vulnerable
harms,
other
sub-groups
(e.g.,
pregnant
women,
drivers,
older
adults,
those
co-morbidities)
advised
exercise
particular
caution
risks.
Legal/regulated
should
be
used
where
possible.
result
in
outcomes,
mostly
higher-risk
use.
Reducing
help
offer
one
targeted
intervention
component
within
a
comprehensive
approach
They
require
effective
audience-tailoring
dissemination,
regular
updating
as
become
available,
evaluated
impact.
Translational Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
8(1)
Published: Sept. 5, 2018
Abstract
The
main
active
ingredient
in
cannabis,
delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol
(THC),
can
acutely
induce
psychotic
symptoms
and
impair
episodic
working
memory.
Another
major
constituent,
cannabidiol
(CBD),
may
attenuate
these
effects.
This
study
aimed
to
determine
the
effects
of
THC
CBD,
both
alone
combination
on
memory
function.
A
randomised,
double-blind
crossover
design
compared
(i)
placebo,
(ii)
8
mg,
(iii)
CBD
16
mg
(iv)
+
administered
by
inhalation
through
a
vaporiser.
Using
an
experimental
medicine
approach
predict
treatment
sensitivity,
we
selected
48
cannabis
users
from
community
basis
(1)
schizotypal
personality
questionnaire
scores
(low,
high)
(2)
frequency
use
(light,
heavy).
Brief
Psychiatric
Rating
Scale
(BPRS),
Psychotomimetic
States
Inventory
(PSI),
immediate
delayed
prose
recall
(episodic
memory),
1-
2-back
(working
memory)
were
assessed
each
day.
Results
indicated
that
increased
overall
PSI,
negative
BPRS,
robustly
impaired
Co-administration
did
not
reduced
PSI
light
only.
At
ratio
2:1,
does
acute
impairing
vaporised
THC.
Frequent
show
blunted
anti-
response
which
is
concern
due
high
rates
disorders
patients
with
schizophrenia.
The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
45(6), P. 563 - 579
Published: July 31, 2019
Background:
Cannabis
is
the
most
widely
used
illicit
substance
worldwide,
and
legalization
for
recreational
medical
purposes
has
substantially
increased
its
availability
use
in
United
States.Objectives:
Decades
of
research
have
suggested
that
cannabis
confers
risk
cognitive
impairment
across
various
domains,
structural
functional
differences
brain
been
linked
to
early
heavy
use.Methods:
With
substantial
evidence
role
endocannabinoid
system
neural
development
understanding
continues
into
adulthood,
rising
adolescents
young
adults
raises
major
concerns.
Yet
some
formulations
cannabinoid
compounds
are
FDA-approved
uses,
including
applications
children.Results:
Potential
effects
on
trajectory
morphology
cognition,
therefore,
should
be
considered.
The
goal
this
review
update
consolidate
relevant
findings
order
inform
attitudes
public
policy
regarding
compounds.Conclusions:
point
considerations
age
limits
guidelines
use.
Addiction,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
115(3), P. 559 - 572
Published: Aug. 13, 2019
To
summarize
and
evaluate
our
knowledge
of
the
relationship
between
heavy
cannabis
use,
use
disorder
(CUD)
brain.Narrative
review
relevant
literature
identified
through
existing
systematic
reviews,
meta-analyses
a
PubMed
search.
Epidemiology,
clinical
representations,
potential
causal
mechanisms,
assessments,
treatment
prognosis
are
discussed.Although
causality
is
unclear,
dependent
consistently
associated
with
high
prevalence
comorbid
psychiatric
disorders
learning
memory
impairments
that
seem
to
recover
after
period
abstinence.
Evidence
regarding
other
cognitive
domains
neurological
consequences,
including
cerebrovascular
events,
limited
inconsistent.
Abstinence
only
achieved
in
minority
cases;
targeted
at
reduction
appears
have
some
success.
Potential
moderators
impact
CUD
on
brain
include
age
onset,
heaviness
severity,
ratio
∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol
cannabidiol
severity
disorders.Current
evidence
long-term
effects
daily
brain-related
outcomes
suggestive
rather
than
conclusive,
but
morbidity
Psychological Medicine,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
48(14), P. 2346 - 2352
Published: Jan. 30, 2018
Abstract
Background
The
number
of
people
entering
specialist
drug
treatment
for
cannabis
problems
has
increased
considerably
in
recent
years.
reasons
this
are
unclear,
but
rising
potency
could
be
a
contributing
factor.
Methods
Cannabis
data
were
obtained
from
an
ongoing
monitoring
programme
the
Netherlands.
We
analysed
concentrations
δ
-9-tetrahydrocannabinol
(THC)
most
popular
variety
domestic
herbal
sold
each
retail
outlet
(2000–2015).
Mixed
effects
linear
regression
models
examined
time-dependent
associations
between
THC
and
first-time
admissions
to
treatment.
Candidate
time
lags
0–10
years,
based
on
normative
European
data.
Results
mean
(95%
CI)
8.62
(7.97–9.27)
20.38
(19.09–21.67)
2000
2004
then
decreased
15.31
(14.24–16.38)
2015.
First-time
(per
100
000
inhabitants)
rose
7.08
26.36
2010,
19.82
was
positively
associated
with
entry
at
0–9
strongest
association
5
b
=
0.370
(0.317–0.424),
p
<
0.0001.
After
adjusting
age,
sex
non-cannabis
admissions,
these
positive
attenuated
remained
statistically
significant
5–7
years
again
0.082
(0.052–0.111),
Conclusions
In
16-year
observational
study,
we
found
changes
These
biologically
plausible,
their
strength
after
adjustment
suggests
that
other
factors
also
important.
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
269(1), P. 37 - 58
Published: Jan. 24, 2019
The
impact
of
cannabis
on
the
adolescent
compared
to
adult
brain
is
interest
researchers
and
society
alike.
From
a
theoretical
perspective,
adolescence
represents
period
both
risk
resilience
harms
use
disorders.
aim
this
systematic
review
provide
critical
examination
moderating
role
age
relationship
between
cognition.
To
end,
we
reviewed
human
animal
studies
that
formally
tested
whether
age,
or
adult,
changes
exposure
cognitive
outcomes.
While
results
do
not
offer
conclusive
answer
novel
question,
along
with
inclusion
work,
has
allowed
for
formation
new
hypotheses
be
addressed
in
future
work.
First,
general
executive
functioning
seems
more
impaired
frequent
users
users.
Second,
age-effects
may
most
prominent
among
very
heavy
dependent
Third,
craving
inhibitory
control
decrease
as
much
post-intoxication
adolescents
adults.
Lastly,
adolescents'
vulnerability
reduced
learning
following
persist
after
sustained
abstinence.
If
these
prove
correct,
it
could
lead
important
developments
policy
prevention
efforts.
Psychological Medicine,
Journal Year:
2017,
Volume and Issue:
47(15), P. 2708 - 2719
Published: May 30, 2017
Cannabis
and
tobacco
have
contrasting
cognitive
effects.
Smoking
cannabis
with
is
prevalent
in
many
countries
although
this
may
well
influence
mental
health
outcomes,
the
possibility
has
rarely
been
investigated
human
experimental
psychopharmacological
research.The
individual
interactive
effects
of
were
evaluated
24
non-dependent
smokers
a
randomized,
placebo-controlled,
double-blind,
2
(cannabis,
placebo)
×
(tobacco,
crossover
design.
Verbal
memory
(prose
recall),
working
(WM)
performance
including
maintenance,
manipulation
attention
(N-back),
psychotomimetic,
subjective
cardiovascular
measures
recorded
on
each
four
sessions.Cannabis
alone
impaired
verbal
memory.
A
priori
contrasts
indicated
that
offset
delayed
recall.
However,
was
not
supported
by
linear
mixed
model
analysis.
load-dependently
WM.
By
contrast,
improved
WM
across
all
load
levels.
The
acute
psychotomimetic
ratings
'stoned'
'dizzy'
induced
altered
tobacco.
had
independent
increasing
heart
rate
interacting
diastolic
blood
pressure.Relative
to
placebo,
Tobacco
enhanced
WM,
independently
cannabis.
Moreover,
we
found
some
preliminary
evidence
delayed,
but
immediate,
In
unaffected
co-administration.
reducing
impairment
from
cannabis,
co-administration
perpetuate
use
despite
adverse
consequences.